Friday, November 6, 2009

灼热的生命

灼热的生命
作词:王新莲 作曲:林琼珑/韩贤光 编曲:Chris Babida
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地烧
让我睁大眼睛 把一切都看清
把烟雾全部拨开 无悔无恨地走下去
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地烧
过去现在未来 全在我心里
什么轮回我不管 浴火重生新的自己
喔~ 山高水深 云淡风清
生命的章法 复杂的一如繁星
火凤凰的愿望 是刹那间的那个决定
而我奔窜的血液 正是那件火红的外衣
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地烧
过去现在未来 全在我心里
什么轮回我不管 浴火重生新的自己
喔~ 山高水深 云淡风清
生命的章法 复杂的一如繁星
火凤凰的愿望 是刹那间的那个决定
而我奔窜的血液 正是那件火红的外衣
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧
燃烧 灼热的生命 慢慢地 慢慢地烧

Friday, October 2, 2009

國共合體 他一身歷史印記

王忠明手部、胸部、背部還留有當初自願撤退到台灣,在身上刺反共等字的標語。
記者李蕙君/攝影

台東市八十一歲榮民王忠明,娶妻的隔天就離家出征勦匪去了,結果受傷被俘成了共軍,參加韓戰抗美援朝失敗被送到台灣,再次成為國軍。他怕拖累大陸家人而改名,如今體內還留著勦匪受傷時的彈殼。

昨天,是中國建政六十周年,看著電視直播中共閱兵畫面,對照自己胸前、手臂多處「殺朱拔毛」的反共刺青,走過一甲子的他,有時空錯置的感覺,嘆自己的遭遇是「歷史的錯誤」。

「少小離家卻不能老大回,」王忠明說,即使目前兩岸來往頻繁,回山東老家不難,「我還記得『王宗祿』娶老婆的隔天就離家出征了,家裡的地址都還記得;但人事已非,寄了好幾十封信都沒音信,我是回不去了!」

原名王宗祿的王忠明,十六歲離家征戰,被共軍俘虜,後來派往朝鮮支援韓戰。戰敗後,他選擇追求自由來到台灣,被視為反共義士,同行還有一萬四千多人。

他說為表明反共決心與忠誠,來台前,拿著織麻布袋的大頭針,在身上刺「三民主義、建國救世」「殺朱拔毛、報仇雪恨」等刺青;憂心家人遭追殺,不得不改名,又怕忘了本名,因此在左手刺上本名「王宗祿」。

回憶過往征戰,最慘烈莫過勦匪時中彈,瞬間血流如注。他說:「子彈從左胸穿過左背爆開一個大彈孔,彈頭還在體內,醫生說開刀有危險,一直沒拿,現在身體偶爾會痠痛。」

來台後,他還參加八二三砲戰,常說:「我的生日有很多天,只要是戰後存活的日子都是生日。」五十八年他退伍,擔任公路局司機,在台東展開新生活。

回首過往,他說:「那是一場不得不打的戰爭(國共內戰),多少兄弟當時一個是共軍,一個是國軍,兩相廝殺,沒什麼對錯,就是自保而已。」

Sunday, July 12, 2009

(時間子句式的)分詞構句可予以「減化」嗎?

http://www.yentzu.idv.tw/yen_talk.asp?my_id=55

也請參考 副詞子句連接詞
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!uvuF2ZieGRZJuB4yD_bOH6qQO9E-/article?mid=325&prev=330&next=324

由於有不少讀者問到「分詞構句」的「減化」問題,我現在把我書中關於這一部份的說明略為簡化並稍加一點說明放在這裡供大家參考:

A. 「背景子句」與「時間子句」的不同

最近幾年市面上有位名氣頗大並且兼某英語雜誌總主筆的補教名師出版了一本非常暢銷的英文文法書「...魔法師之文法俱樂部」,其中便用所謂「減化」的觀念來解釋分詞構句。

下面便是這位先生的「減化」理論中最重要的一環—–「副詞子句的減化」—–的一個典型三部驟。請讀者思考一下,這個理論有沒有什麼不妥的地方?

思考:1. While he was lying on the couch, the boy fell asleep. (這男孩躺在沙發上時,睡著了。)

可以減化成:

2. While lying on the couch, the boy fell asleep. (這男孩躺在沙發上時,睡著了。)

更可再減化成:

3. Lying on the couch, the boy fell asleep.

英語文法學者(譬如Azar Shrampfar所寫的Understanding and Using English Grammar)都把第二句視為是第一句的「子句簡化」(reduced clauses),這點沒錯。至於第三句則由於「通常」是與第一、二句意義不同的另一種句子,因此並不被文法學者視為是前兩句的「簡化」。

然而國內這位寫「魔法書」的先生則說,「第二句在省略掉While之後,句意仍很清楚,所以2句「減化」成3句是很自然的。」他不了解為什麼「傳統」的文法學者會把 Lying on the couch...這樣的句型稱為「分詞構句」,而認為他自己發明了一個前人所未能見及的文法解釋理論。他說:「了解減化子句的來龍去脈之後,就會了解「分詞構句」一詞實在是多此一舉。lying on the couch本來就是副詞子句While he was lying on the couch的減化,無需用任何特別名稱來表示。」

這位先生之所以會有這樣的誤解,乃是因為他不了解分詞構句的功能–—–這是缺乏寫作經驗....的結果。

所謂「縮減子句」(reduced clauses)乃是寫作者為了修辭的「精簡」而將一些子句的句型「精簡」成片語句型。我們在前面已經向讀者介紹過。此地我們且先來談上面的第三句 Lying on the couch, the boy fell asleep.為什麼不是前面兩句的簡化。

傳統文法學者之所以不將上述第三句視為是一、二兩句的簡化乃是因為一、二兩句跟三句的意思並不相同。一、二兩句只是一個單純的時間副詞子句,說明「這個男孩」睡著的「時間」,而三句所企圖要說明的則有可能是「這個男孩」睡著的「原因」。

以分詞構句開頭做引導的句型,如上面的三句,一般乃是用來做為原因或背景說明的。(※參見前節「代替原因子句」一段說明)

Lying on the couch, the boy fell asleep.

躺在沙發上,這孩子睡著了。

這句話所意含的有可能是,這孩子原先並不是躺在沙發上,或許原先是在地上,或是被大人背著,之後放到沙發上才睡著。它是為了與「其他情況」做比較所做的說明,跟一、二兩句之只是單純說明時間是完全不同的。上面的句子由於太短,所以這種「背景說明」的性質並不明顯,讀者若是將之擴充成下句的情況,就可以很清楚的明白這個道理。

Lying on the (soft cushion of the) couch, the boy (soon) fell asleep.

躺在沙發(軟綿綿的墊子)上,這孩子(很快)的就睡著了。

我們只有在極少數不影響句意的情況下,可以將時間子句連接詞while省略,譬如下句:

While walking/Walking on Dun-Hwa South Road yesterday, I came across an old friend whom I haven’t seen for years.

昨天我走在敦化南路上時,碰到一位多年不見的老朋友。

這是因為「走在路上」這種事情甚為單純,在這一句中不太可能會有什麼作用使之可以成為主要子句的背景,所以不太影響句意,從而可以「省略」(※新加說明:按,這裡的While之所以能省略,主要也是因為主要子句中已有另一個時間副詞yesterday所以能省略)。下句則不同:

Walking along Taipei’s tree-lined Dun-Hwa South Road, one can see quite a few really nice European style coffee shops.

走在台北敦化南路的林蔭道上,你可以看到不少真的很不錯的歐式咖啡館。

這個句子的分詞構句所要說的便是「原因」(只有走在敦化南路你才能看見),而非是「時間」,因此跟While walking...是不同的。

這種「時間」(temporal)子句與「因由」(causal)子句的不同不知為何會有許多國人不能分別。最近我在一份七八年前出版的GMAT暢銷舊講義中也看到作者所舉的一個說明「絕對分詞構句」的例句:

(When he was five years old, his father died. =)

He being five years old, his father died. (??)

(由於)他五歲,他的父親死了。(??)

「分詞構句」都是用來說明「主要子句」所敘述事件「之所以會/可能如此...」的緣由的,即使是「絕對(「自由」)分詞構句」亦然。「絕對分詞構句」雖然在文法上不必跟主要子句有所關聯,在文意上卻仍然不能跟主要子句離題。像上述這樣純粹「時間性」的句子並不宜改用「分詞構句」——不管是否「絕對分詞」構句 ——來寫,因為「他五歲」跟「他的父親死了」兩者之間除了時間上的「重疊」以外,並不可能互相有所「影響」。我看這位作者是位學養俱豐的長者,應該不致犯此錯誤,或許是「信手拈來」一個句子,並且未仔細校稿,致有此誤吧。總之,類似這樣的句子通常所要說的應該比較可能是類似如下的「故事」:

His father having died and he being only five years old, his mother had to leave him in the care of a relative and go up north to look for jobs.

由於他的父親過世,而且他才五歲,他媽媽不得不將他托給一個親戚照顧,之後北上找工作。

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Blink Twice if You Like me

MATING In many fireflies, pairs stay coupled for hours while the male, lower, gives the female a protein package injected with sperm, called a nuptial gift.


Melody Ko/Tufts University

RESEARCHER Sara Lewis is an evolutionary ecologist at Tufts University who studies firefly mating habits.

Tufts University

SPIRALS A coiled nuptial gift may take up a lot of space in a male’s abdomen. Receiving a gift can make a difference in the female’s reproductive success.

LINCOLN, Mass. — Sara Lewis is fluent in firefly. On this night she walks through a farm field in eastern Massachusetts, watching the first fireflies of the evening rise into the air and begin to blink on and off. Dr. Lewis, an evolutionary ecologist at Tufts University, points out six species in this meadow, each with its own pattern of flashes.

Along one edge of the meadow are Photinus greeni, with double pulses separated by three seconds of darkness. Near a stream are Photinus ignitus, with a five-second delay between single pulses. And near a forest are Pyractomena angulata, which make Dr. Lewis’s favorite flash pattern. “It’s like a flickering orange rain,” she said.

The fireflies flashing in the air are all males. Down in the grass, Dr. Lewis points out, females are sitting and observing. They look for flash patterns of males of their own species, and sometimes they respond with a single flash of their own, always at a precise interval after the male’s. Dr. Lewis takes out a penlight and clicks it twice, in perfect Photinus greeni. A female Photinus greeni flashes back.

“Most people don’t realize there’s this call and response going on,” Dr. Lewis said. “But it’s very, very easy to talk to fireflies.”

For Dr. Lewis, this meadow is the stage for an invertebrate melodrama, full of passion and yearning, of courtship duets and competitions for affection, of cruel deception and gruesome death. For the past 16 years, Dr. Lewis has been coming to this field to decipher the evolutionary forces at play in this production, as fireflies have struggled to survive and spread their genes to the next generation.

It was on a night much like this one in 1980 when Dr. Lewis first came under the spell of fireflies. She was in graduate school at Duke University, studying coral reef fish. Waiting for a grant to come through for a trip to Belize, she did not have much else to do but sit in her backyard in North Carolina.

“Every evening there was this incredible display of fireflies,” Dr. Lewis said. She eventually started to explore the yard, inspecting the males and females. “What really struck me was that in this one-acre area there were hundreds of males and I could only find two or three females,” she said. “I thought, ‘Man, this is so intense.’ ”

When a lot of males are competing for the chance to mate with females, a species experiences a special kind of evolution. If males have certain traits that make them attractive to females, they will mate more than other males. And that preference may mean that those attractive males can pass down their traits to the next generation. Over thousands of generations, the entire species may be transformed.

Charles Darwin described this process, which he called sexual selection, in 1871, using male displays of antlers and feathers as examples. He did not mention fireflies. In fact, fireflies remained fairly mysterious for another century. It was not until the 1960s that James Lloyd, a University of Florida biologist, deciphered the call and response of several species of North American firefly.

Dr. Lewis, realizing that other firefly mysteries remained to be solved, switched to fireflies from fish in 1984, when she became a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard. She taught herself Dr. Lloyd’s firefly code and then began to investigate firefly mating habits. North American fireflies spend two years underground as larvae, then spend the final two weeks of their lives as adults, flashing, mating and laying eggs. When Dr. Lewis started studying fireflies, scientists could not say whether the females mated once and then laid all their eggs, or mated with many males. “Nobody knew what happened after the lights went out,” Dr. Lewis said.

She searched for mating fireflies in the evening, marked their locations with surveyor’s flags and then revisited them every half-hour through the night. They were still mating at dawn.

“It was cool to watch the sun rise and see the couples breaking up and the females crawling down the grass to lay their eggs,” Dr. Lewis said.

Many Americans are familiar with the kinds of fireflies Dr. Lewis studies, but they represent only a tiny fraction of the 2,000 species worldwide. And there is enormous variation in these insects. “There are some species that produce flashes when they’re adults, and there are some that simply glow as adults,” Dr. Lewis said. “Then there are a whole bunch of species where the adults don’t produce any light at all.”

In recent years scientists have analyzed the DNA of fireflies to figure out how their light has evolved. The common ancestor of today’s fireflies probably produced light only when they were larvae. All firefly larvae still glow today, as a warning to would-be predators. The larvae produce bitter chemicals that make them an unpleasant meal.

As adults, the earliest fireflies probably communicated with chemical signals, the way some firefly species do today. Only much later did some firefly species gain through evolution the ability to make light as adults. Instead of a warning, the light became a mating call. (An enzyme in the firefly’s tail drives a chemical reaction that makes light.)

The more Dr. Lewis watched firefly courtship, the clearer it became that the females were carefully choosing mates. They start dialogues with up to 10 males in a single evening and can keep several conversations going at once. But a female mates with only one male, typically the one she has responded to the most.

Dr. Lewis wondered if the female fireflies were picking their mates based on variations in the flashes of the males. To test that possibility, she took female fireflies to her lab, where she has computer-controlled light systems that can mimic firefly flashes. “You can play back specific signals to females and see what they respond to,” Dr. Lewis said.

The female fireflies turned out to be remarkably picky. In many cases, a male flash got no response at all. In some species, females preferred faster pulse rates. In others, the females preferred males that made long-lasting pulses.

If females preferred some flashes over others, Dr. Lewis wondered why those preferences had evolved in the first place. One possible explanation was that the signals gave female fireflies a valuable clue about the males. Somehow, mating with males with certain flash patterns allowed females to produce more offspring, which would inherit their preference.

It is possible that females use flashes to figure out which males can offer the best gifts. In many invertebrate species, the males provide females with food to help nourish their eggs. Dr. Lewis and her colleagues discovered that fireflies also made these so-called nuptial gifts — packages of protein they inject with their sperm.

Dr. Lewis is not sure why she and her colleagues were the first to find them. The gifts form coils that can take up a lot of space in a male firefly’s abdomen. “They’re incredibly beautiful,” she said.

Receiving nuptial gifts, Dr. Lewis and her colleagues have shown, can make a huge difference in the reproductive success of a female firefly. “It just about doubles the number of eggs a female can lay in her lifetime,” she said. One reason the effect is so big is that fireflies do not eat during their two-week adulthood. A slowly starving female can use a nuptial gift to build more eggs.

In at least some species, females may use flashes to pick out males with the biggest gifts. Dr. Lewis has tested this hypothesis in two species; in one, males with conspicuous flashes have bigger gifts. In another species, she found no link.

“In some cases they could be honest signals, and in some cases they could be deceptive signals,” Dr. Lewis said.

Deception may, in fact, evolve very easily among fireflies. It turns out that a male firefly does not need to burn many extra calories to make flashes. “It takes some energy, but it’s tiny. It’s less costly for a male than flying around,” Dr. Lewis said.

If making light is so cheap for males, it seems odd that they have not all evolved to be more attractive to females. “What is it that keeps their flashes from getting longer and longer or faster and faster?” Dr. Lewis asked.

Scanning the meadow, she grabbed her insect net and ran after a fast-flying firefly with a triple flash. She caught an animal that may offer the answer to her question. Dr. Lewis dropped the insect into a tube and switched on a headlamp to show her catch. Called Photuris, it is a firefly that eats other fireflies.

“They are really nasty predators,” Dr. Lewis said. Photuris fireflies sometimes stage aerial assaults, picking out other species by their flashes and swooping down to attack. In other cases, they sit on a blade of grass, responding to male fireflies with deceptive flashes. When the males approach, Photuris grabs them.

“They pounce, they bite, they suck blood — all the gory stuff,” Dr. Lewis said. She has found that each Photuris can eat several fireflies in a night. Photuris kills other fireflies only to retrieve bad-tasting chemicals from their bodies, which it uses to protect itself from predators.

To study how Photuris predation affects its firefly prey, Dr. Lewis and her colleagues built sticky traps equipped with lights that mimicked courtship signals of Photuris’s victims. The scientists found that Photuris was more likely to attack when flash rates were faster. In other words, conspicuous flashes — the ones females prefer — also make males more likely to be killed.

“At least where Photuris predators are around,” Dr. Lewis said, “there’s going to be a strong selection for less conspicuous flashes.”

Thursday, June 18, 2009

The Structure of Eukaryotic Chromosomes

http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/staff/dave/roanoke/genetics980218.html

Biology 210
GENETICS
18 February, 1998

Leaf 65

Chapter 6c

The Structure of Eukaryotic Chromosomes

Part 2: DNA Compaction
in chromatin and chromosomes

leaf 41

A Brief Outline

    6.4a Introduction.

    6.4b The Nucleosome is the Basic Structure Unit in Chromatin.

    6.4c Nucleosome Core Particles.

    6.4d The Arrangement of Chromatin Fibers in a Chromosome.

    6.4e DNA sequences affecting chromosome condensation.

    6.5 Polytene Chromosomes.



    Friez 34



    6.4a Introduction

    Figure 6_0 from Griffiths et al. - Lampbrush chromosomes

      Just like in bacteria, the DNA in eukaryotes is highly compacted (roughly 7000x in mitotic chromosomes). However, unlike bacteria, in most eukaryotes, the DNA forms stable protein complexes. Here's a picture of a "lampbrush chromosome", which is thought to reflect the underlying orgainsation of all chromosomes, with a central scaffold (here stained brightly) and projecting lateral loops (stained red) formed by a folded continuous strand of DNA associated with histone proteins.



    If you were to extract the DNA from a single, linear chromosome, and stretch it out, it would be one very long molecule (more than 2 cm for human chromosome 1).

    Figure 6_3 from Griffiths et al., 1996



    The level of chromosome condensation can be monitored using electron microscopy. It is possible to control the condensation by varying the ionic strength of the solution.


    Here is a very famous picture in which the chromosome (see the "X" in the middle) has been carefully manipulated such that all of the histone proteins have been removed - you can see all the DNA make loops to and from the central scaffold. There is an enormous amount of DNA in the chromosomes.

    Figure 16-7 from Griffiths et al., 1996.






    6.4b The Nucleosome is the Basic Structure Unit in Chromatin

    The first level of compaction is where the DNA wraps around nucleosomes.
    Griffiths et al., 1996

    On the Histone family of proteins:

    There are 4 histone components of the nucleosome:

    histone evolutionary conservation
    H2A moderately conserved
    H2B moderately conserved
    H3 very conserved
    H4 nearly 100% conserved

    Most organisms contain many copies of the histone genes, in tandem repeats scattered through the chromosomes.
    Figure 16-23 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    6.4c Nucleosome Core Particles

    Nucleosome core particle

    The organisation of nucleosomes. The DNA molecule is wrapped around the nucleosome about 2 times. The nucleosome actually consists of a histone octamer, with two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. This is Figure 6.8 from you text (page 231).
    Figure 6-8 from Hartl & Jones, 1998


    6.4d The Arrangement of Chromatin Fibers in a Chromosome

    Figure 6_10 from Hartl & Jones. The DNA is wrapped around the nucleosome core particles, which are then condensed into a 30 nm fiber. This then folds into a larger 300 nm fiber, which coils up into a 700 nm fiber, which then makes up the 1400 nm chromatid arm.
    Figure 6_10 from Hartl & Jones, 1998


    Figure 6_11 from Hartl & Jones, 1998

      This is a view of the formation of the 30 nm fiber. The nucleosomes all line up, and are stacked kind of like pennies on their sides. The middle bit is held together by histone H1, as shown in the figure below.



    Figure 16_5b from Griffiths et al., 1996

    This 30 nm fiber is then further compacted:
    Figure 16-8 from Griffiths et al., 1996


    The chromosome condensation is a dynamic process, as can be seen by the following drawing of chromosomes in meiotic prophase from a protozoan:
    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996


    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    6.4x DNA sequences affecting chromosome condensation

    Remember from last week, there are certain DNA sequences that can be quite rigid, and some sequences can be flexible. There are some DNA sequences which can facilitate chromatin condensation, and amplification of these sequences results in large regions of chromatin that is very condensed. One such motif is the CGG triplet repeat, which, when amplified causes the DNA in the chromosome to form what is called a "fragile site", because when viewed under the electron microscope, this region looks like it might break off quite easily. In fact, chromosome breakage at this point DOES occur quite often, and it is associated with many different types of genetic diseases in humans. For example, "fragile X" syndrome is the most common genetic form of mental retardation in humans - and the molecular basis of this disease has been found to be due to the amplification of a triplet repeat of the CGG sequence from about 20 copies (e.g., 60 bp long) to a repeat of up to several THOUSAND base pairs in length. When the DNA gets amplified, the resulting change in chromosome structure provides a "fragile site". Amplification of triplet repeats is also responsible for more than 40 other diseases in humans, including Huntington disease.


    J Biol Chem 1996 Oct 4;271(40):24325-24328

    Nucleosome assembly on methylated CGG triplet repeats in the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 promoter.

    Godde JS, Kass SU, Hirst MC, Wolffe AP

    Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, NICHHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5430, USA.

    Expansion and methylation of CGG repeat sequences is associated with Fragile X syndrome in humans. We have examined the consequences of CGG repeat expansion and methylation for nucleosome assembly and positioning on the Fragile X Mental Retardation gene 1 (FMR1) gene. Short unmethylated CGG repeats are not particularly favored in terms of affinity for the histone octamer or for positioning of the reconstituted nucleosome. However, upon methylation their affinity for the histone octamer increases and a highly positioned nucleosome assembles with the
    repeat sequences found adjacent to the nucleosomal dyad. Expansion of these CGG repeats abolishes the preferential nucleosome assembly due to methylation. Thus, the expansion and methylation of these triplet repeats can alter the functional organization of chromatin, which may contribute to alterations in the expression of the FMR1 gene and the disease phenotype.

    PMID: 8798682, UI: 96394576


    6.5 Polytene Chromosomes




    back Back to the GENETICS Syllabus Chromosome icon



    Last modified on: 2 February, 2000 by Dave Ussery

The Structure of Eukaryotic Chromosomes

http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/staff/dave/roanoke/genetics980218.html

Biology 210
GENETICS
18 February, 1998

Leaf 65

Chapter 6c

The Structure of Eukaryotic Chromosomes

Part 2: DNA Compaction
in chromatin and chromosomes

leaf 41

A Brief Outline

    6.4a Introduction.

    6.4b The Nucleosome is the Basic Structure Unit in Chromatin.

    6.4c Nucleosome Core Particles.

    6.4d The Arrangement of Chromatin Fibers in a Chromosome.

    6.4e DNA sequences affecting chromosome condensation.

    6.5 Polytene Chromosomes.



    Friez 34



    6.4a Introduction

    Figure 6_0 from Griffiths et al. - Lampbrush chromosomes

      Just like in bacteria, the DNA in eukaryotes is highly compacted (roughly 7000x in mitotic chromosomes). However, unlike bacteria, in most eukaryotes, the DNA forms stable protein complexes. Here's a picture of a "lampbrush chromosome", which is thought to reflect the underlying orgainsation of all chromosomes, with a central scaffold (here stained brightly) and projecting lateral loops (stained red) formed by a folded continuous strand of DNA associated with histone proteins.



    If you were to extract the DNA from a single, linear chromosome, and stretch it out, it would be one very long molecule (more than 2 cm for human chromosome 1).

    Figure 6_3 from Griffiths et al., 1996



    The level of chromosome condensation can be monitored using electron microscopy. It is possible to control the condensation by varying the ionic strength of the solution.


    Here is a very famous picture in which the chromosome (see the "X" in the middle) has been carefully manipulated such that all of the histone proteins have been removed - you can see all the DNA make loops to and from the central scaffold. There is an enormous amount of DNA in the chromosomes.

    Figure 16-7 from Griffiths et al., 1996.






    6.4b The Nucleosome is the Basic Structure Unit in Chromatin

    The first level of compaction is where the DNA wraps around nucleosomes.
    Griffiths et al., 1996

    On the Histone family of proteins:

    There are 4 histone components of the nucleosome:

    histone evolutionary conservation
    H2A moderately conserved
    H2B moderately conserved
    H3 very conserved
    H4 nearly 100% conserved

    Most organisms contain many copies of the histone genes, in tandem repeats scattered through the chromosomes.
    Figure 16-23 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    6.4c Nucleosome Core Particles

    Nucleosome core particle

    The organisation of nucleosomes. The DNA molecule is wrapped around the nucleosome about 2 times. The nucleosome actually consists of a histone octamer, with two copies each of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. This is Figure 6.8 from you text (page 231).
    Figure 6-8 from Hartl & Jones, 1998


    6.4d The Arrangement of Chromatin Fibers in a Chromosome

    Figure 6_10 from Hartl & Jones. The DNA is wrapped around the nucleosome core particles, which are then condensed into a 30 nm fiber. This then folds into a larger 300 nm fiber, which coils up into a 700 nm fiber, which then makes up the 1400 nm chromatid arm.
    Figure 6_10 from Hartl & Jones, 1998


    Figure 6_11 from Hartl & Jones, 1998

      This is a view of the formation of the 30 nm fiber. The nucleosomes all line up, and are stacked kind of like pennies on their sides. The middle bit is held together by histone H1, as shown in the figure below.



    Figure 16_5b from Griffiths et al., 1996

    This 30 nm fiber is then further compacted:
    Figure 16-8 from Griffiths et al., 1996


    The chromosome condensation is a dynamic process, as can be seen by the following drawing of chromosomes in meiotic prophase from a protozoan:
    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996


    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    Figure 16_6 from Griffiths et al., 1996

    6.4x DNA sequences affecting chromosome condensation

    Remember from last week, there are certain DNA sequences that can be quite rigid, and some sequences can be flexible. There are some DNA sequences which can facilitate chromatin condensation, and amplification of these sequences results in large regions of chromatin that is very condensed. One such motif is the CGG triplet repeat, which, when amplified causes the DNA in the chromosome to form what is called a "fragile site", because when viewed under the electron microscope, this region looks like it might break off quite easily. In fact, chromosome breakage at this point DOES occur quite often, and it is associated with many different types of genetic diseases in humans. For example, "fragile X" syndrome is the most common genetic form of mental retardation in humans - and the molecular basis of this disease has been found to be due to the amplification of a triplet repeat of the CGG sequence from about 20 copies (e.g., 60 bp long) to a repeat of up to several THOUSAND base pairs in length. When the DNA gets amplified, the resulting change in chromosome structure provides a "fragile site". Amplification of triplet repeats is also responsible for more than 40 other diseases in humans, including Huntington disease.


    J Biol Chem 1996 Oct 4;271(40):24325-24328

    Nucleosome assembly on methylated CGG triplet repeats in the fragile X mental retardation gene 1 promoter.

    Godde JS, Kass SU, Hirst MC, Wolffe AP

    Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, NICHHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5430, USA.

    Expansion and methylation of CGG repeat sequences is associated with Fragile X syndrome in humans. We have examined the consequences of CGG repeat expansion and methylation for nucleosome assembly and positioning on the Fragile X Mental Retardation gene 1 (FMR1) gene. Short unmethylated CGG repeats are not particularly favored in terms of affinity for the histone octamer or for positioning of the reconstituted nucleosome. However, upon methylation their affinity for the histone octamer increases and a highly positioned nucleosome assembles with the
    repeat sequences found adjacent to the nucleosomal dyad. Expansion of these CGG repeats abolishes the preferential nucleosome assembly due to methylation. Thus, the expansion and methylation of these triplet repeats can alter the functional organization of chromatin, which may contribute to alterations in the expression of the FMR1 gene and the disease phenotype.

    PMID: 8798682, UI: 96394576


    6.5 Polytene Chromosomes




    back Back to the GENETICS Syllabus Chromosome icon



    Last modified on: 2 February, 2000 by Dave Ussery